-----Original Message----- From: Robert Paul <Robert.Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Aug 26, 2004 12:56 AM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Theory of democracy... .John expresses the hope that democracy will work. But his hope is based on idealism. Voters don't know, and worse yet, don't care, what they are voting on.< This may be true in national elections; it is surely less true the closer one gets to a local initiative or referendum. A.A. When the issues touch a local cord, usually school budgets, the turnout is higher or even high. Without something like that to galvanize them, local elections go by unnoticed. I agree with Andreas that if people don't know what the issues are, then their votes are meaningless. R.P. I find the claim that voters don't care what they are voting on (as if they're just making random marks on something nomially thought of as a 'ballot') unconvincing. But I'm sure these conclusions aren't meant to apply to anyone on this list. A.A. The ones who care enough to vote are likely to know who and what they are voting for. The problem is, few vote. I'm sure there is a way to verify the stats as to numbers who vote. Regarding the CNN story about politicians as entertainers (Clinton playing the sax as the most important thing he did to win the election), I would like to think it's not true (which is a problem in itself). On the other hand, Gore was criticized for having no personality, not on what he stood for. I suspect Robert Paul has a higher opinion of humanity than I have. Andy Amago Robert Paul Reed College ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html