Even if the weapons that destroyed the site were nuclear? And further, if,
as you claim, the US military are not going to invade, who exactly is going
to be overseeing the inspections? Perhaps an overflight might sort it out,
but frankly Eric, I couldn't trust such information if it were suddenly
announced by the US military.
But at the end of the day, to test your hypothesis after exacting the
execution is not the best procedure is it.
Simon
Simon: To reiterate my previous post, this time the US military will be destroying the evidence in the act, so perhaps we'll never know.
Cordesman & Al-Rodhan mention somewhere that sampling the debris and particulate emissions from an attack zone would prove that it was a weapons plant rather than a mere centrifugal enrichment facility. They refer to it as a "post facto smoking gun."
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
