[lit-ideas] Re: Grice's Implicature
- From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:12:41 -0700
Donal writes
As I am still here trying to explain: without understanding the 'key
tenet', PI cannot be properly understood. The 'key tenet' is at the back
of W says: and is fundamental to what W seeks to show.
This implies that I have never 'properly understood' the Philosophical
Investigations (all or in part, apparently). In light of that, my
participation in this discussion is at an end.
Robert Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
