[lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Paul Stone <pas@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:27:27 -0400
Except that Mike's comment is a completely gratuitous insult for insult
sake (which, if Mike needs to do it, I hope he understands why he needs to
do it) I do regret having hurt the trust level of the list. However,
people don't see WHY I did it, which has been explained and they don't care
that I have tried as best I could to rectify it.
So... why on EARTH, nine months later, are you still posting as Andy Amago?
Are you playing some weird fantasy game?
p
##########
Paul Stone
pas@xxxxxxxx
Kingsville, ON, Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Mike Geary
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Andy Amago
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
Except that Mike's comment is a completely gratuitous insult for insult sake (which, if Mike needs to do it, I hope he understands why he needs to do it) I do regret having hurt the trust level of the list. However, people don't see WHY I did it, which has been explained and they don't care that I have tried as best I could to rectify it.
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Andy Amago