[Linux-Anyway] Re: eth1
- From: Meph Istopheles <meph@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Linux-Anyway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Horror,
Alright. Maybe I'm just not having a good day. I'd connected
the second nic to a second hub (the one my brother's 'puter uses
though it ~is~ connected to the first hub) & find that I get no
light indicating that the second nic is cooperating.
So, using linuxconf, I removed all entries concerning eth1,
leaving only eth0 with the public address. I then tried pinging
the private ip for that card & got an unreachable response. OK.
I then enter the command you'd given me to assign a second ip
address to a card which already has an address:
# /sbin/ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.0.2 up
Then, the private address:
# ping 192.168.0.2
PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) from 192.168.0.2 : 56(84) bytes of
data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=90 usec
Good, that works. Now the public address:
# ping 63.249.19.72
PING 63.249.19.72 (63.249.19.72) from 63.249.19.72 : 56(84) bytes
of data.
64 bytes from 63.249.19.72: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=91 usec
Cool. Both addresses work. But the private address on the
W2k box:
# ping 192.168.0.3
PING 192.168.0.3 (192.168.0.3) from 192.168.0.2 : 56(84) bytes of
data.
From 192.168.0.2: Destination Host Unreachable
The W2k box still won't respond. But if I simply supply public
addresses, it works fine.
Are we still stalking ipmasq? The more I read of it the
further I get from getting this working....
Meph
--
Zeus gave Leda the bird.
To unsubcribe send e-mail with the word unsubscribe in the body to:
Linux-Anyway-Request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=unsubscribe
Other related posts:
