On Tue, 11 May 2004 19:28:55 +0200, Godwin Stewart <gstewart@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2004 15:46:45 +0100, John Richard Smith > <bagsofchoice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So which bit of the process would load the ramdrive > > It could be anything. I've just seen how stupid this reply looks. Initially I read "So, which bit of the configuration would *NOT* load the ramdrive"... The answer to the question you *did* ask is this line in the [COMMON] section: devicehigh=ramdrive.sys /E 2048 -- G. Stewart -- gstewart@xxxxxxxxxxx -- gstewart@xxxxxxxxxxx Registered Linux user #284683 (Slackware 9.0, Linux 2.6.6) -------------------------------------------------------------- Spotted in a toilet of a London office: TOILET OUT OF ORDER. PLEASE USE FLOOR BELOW. To unsubcribe send e-mail with the word unsubscribe in the body to: Linux-Anyway-Request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=unsubscribe