Christian, I think I already answered this question. The license is definitely LGPL with no modifications. I don't know how the wrong information is still in http://www.jjb-software.cem/liblouis-guide.html . I thought I had updated it. Needs another look. Thanks for bringing this up. John On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:25:28PM +0100, Christian Egli wrote: > Hi all > > I just noticed a grave mistake in my texinfo version of the manual. I > had created it using some other texinfo manual that I had from another > GNU project, using the same basic structure and title page. This > included also some licensing information that was included on the title > page. So I basically moved the licensing information from its own > section to the title page. In the process of doing this I apparently did > not copy the proper text from the original. I fixed this now in my local > copy where I reinserted the "Licensing" section (as a subsection of > "Programming with liblouis"). I can commit this and we should have the > texinfo manual reflect the state of the documentation at > http://www.jjb-software.com/liblouis-guide.html. > > However this brings me to the next question: The whole licensing > situation seems a bit unclear. The COPYING file in the tar ball says > that liblouis is LGPL. The Google code project page says that it is GPL > v2 and the manual says it is GPL with permissions and restrictions. > Which one is right? > > LGPL seems to make the most sense to me since it is a library, but it is > not up to me to decide. We have to respect the original license from the > copyright holders. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks > Christian > -- > Christian Egli > Swiss Library for the Blind and Visually Impaired > Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland > > For a description of the software and to download it go to > http://www.jjb-software.com -- My websites: http://www.godtouches.org http://www.jjb-software.com Location: Madison, WI, USA For a description of the software and to download it go to http://www.jjb-software.com