[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Back translation

  • From: "Michael Whapples" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "mwhapples@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:41:14 +0100

OK, I now have the issue occurring.

Issues like:
knowledgeen
fromen
are coming out. So there is an issue with the detection of when it should be a single letter contraction. 

Michael Whapples
On 24/06/2014 11:34, Michael Whapples (Redacted sender mwhapples@xxxxxxx for DMARC) wrote: 
Could you expand on this, I see nothing wrong with en-us-g2.ctb.

Could you give actual and expected results for us to compare.

Michael Whapples
On 24/06/2014 11:28, Ken Perry wrote:
Since I received no response last night does this mean no one knows of the back translation problems.No one cares, or the problems I found only happen on my build. 

Ken
*From:*liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ken Perry 
*Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 7:27 PM
*To:* liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [liblouis-liblouisxml] Back translation
Is it just me or has the back translation for both English grade two and UEB gotten worse in the time I have beengone?There seems to be something wrong with short form words followed by en? For example try doing 

Ken

Fen

Ten

With either en-us-g2 or grade 2 ueb tables.

Any idea what broke that and when?

ken

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. liblouis-liblouisxml
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2014