[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Back translation
- From: "John J. Boyer" <john.boyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:35:23 -0500
The tool to use in checking liblouis results is lou_allround .
John
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:34:13AM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote:
> Could you expand on this, I see nothing wrong with en-us-g2.ctb.
>
> Could you give actual and expected results for us to compare.
>
> Michael Whapples
> On 24/06/2014 11:28, Ken Perry wrote:
> >
> >Since I received no response last night does this mean no one
> >knows of the back translation problems.No one cares, or the
> >problems I found only happen on my build.
> >
> >Ken
> >
> >*From:*liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of
> >*Ken Perry
> >*Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 7:27 PM
> >*To:* liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >*Subject:* [liblouis-liblouisxml] Back translation
> >
> >Is it just me or has the back translation for both English grade
> >two and UEB gotten worse in the time I have beengone?There seems
> >to be something wrong with short form words followed by en? For
> >example try doing
> >
> >Ken
> >
> >Fen
> >
> >Ten
> >
> >With either en-us-g2 or grade 2 ueb tables.
> >
> >Any idea what broke that and when?
> >
> >ken
> >
>
--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people with disabilities
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Other related posts:
