[LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- From: Javier Perez <summarex@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
I think it interfered with motor operation if the
lever was left unseated. Mot sure though. It's been
years since I was inside my sl mot. It might have a
motor activation switch on the lever, not sure though.
Javier
--- Gary Pinkerton <gpinkcp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I had also understood that the early MOTs had on/off
> switches.
> Wonder why they changed it from having one, to not
> having one ?
>
>
> >From: Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
> >Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:52:39 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
> >
> >IIRC (and I could be mistaken) some of the early
> MOT bodies have a meter
> >switch.
> >
> >Doug Herr
> >Birdman of Sacramento
> >http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Javier Perez <summarex@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Sep 29, 2005 10:34 AM
> >To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
> >
> >The Mots didn't. At least not mine!
> >Javier
> >
> >--- Reg <rronaldson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > All SLs had the meter switch via the wind on
> lever.
> > >
> > > Reg
> > >
> > > Javier Perez wrote:
> > >
> > > >Oh Yeah
> > > >You're right!
> > > >It was the flex V1 and I think all versions of
> the
> > > SL
> > > >mot that didn't have switches. Not sure about
> the
> > > SL2
> > > >mot.
> > > >Javier
> > > >
> > > >--- Douglas Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Javier Perez <summarex@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>A lot of old meters running 1.35 volt mercury
> > > >>>batteries didn't have on/off switches.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Leicaflex Type 2 (round film counter window)
> has
> > > an
> > > >>on/off switch just like the SL.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Doug Herr
> > > >>Birdman of Sacramento
> > > >>http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> > > >>
> > > ------
> > > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> > > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> > > Archives are at:
> > > www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> > >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
> >------
> >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >Archives are at:
> > www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >
> >------
> >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >Archives are at:
> > www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- From: Gary Pinkerton
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- » [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- [LRflex] Re: Leicaflex meter
- From: Gary Pinkerton