Thomas Schofield wrote: > >Remember the Contx AX that had AF in the body, so >any Contax lens would AF on that body? The AF'er >would move the focusing plane back and forth, rather >than move the lens. Could also serve as a short >extension tube in a pinch! >Tom Hi Tom! Yes, I remember it well! Unfortunately, Contax had some reliability issues with it, and it was not a commercial success. However,it's what I'd like to see in a Leica AF body... as it would preserve the use of all our existing glass! Wishful thinking, I guess... Cheers! --- David Young, Logan Lake, CANADA Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/