[kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- From: Michael Rossberg <mick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:53:20 +0200
>> Oh, and those of you with GPS running already, using the netstumbler
>> log export, am I right in thinking that the longitude and latitude
>> figures given:
>> N 42.006413 W 87.566795 ( 101 ) BSS
>> are dd.mm(.)mmmm? Nothing else seemed to make my home location come
>> close enough to my normal home waypoint. So that the above would be:
>> 42.010688 -87.944658
>> in decimal degrees?
>
> You are right as far as I can tell; same problem here. Maybe Mick
> wants to add to the GPS preferences an option to indicate what the
> format of the GPS receiver is (pure decimal or the dd,(!comma not
> dot!)mm.(?)mmmm format. This will enhance the precision of the map
> plots.
it looks like i made a mistake here.
> And maybe also show the particular GPS coordinates along with the
> 'last seen' in the Networks pane and a breadcrum trace in an empty
> map.
maybe in e....
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/octet-stream
-- File: PGP.sig
- Follow-Ups:
- [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- From: ard . jonker
- References:
- [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- From: ard . jonker
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] possible GPSd implementation by William
- » [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- » [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- » [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- » [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- From: ard . jonker
- [kismac] Re: possible GPSd implementation by William
- From: ard . jonker