I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where most
opensource projects go.
Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't?
If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the project name I guess.
KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days before SVN...
How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third generation?
On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote:
It seems like there are some people willing to restart the development of kismac.
What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc? this is a very nice system: http://trac.edgewall.com/
the adiumx guys use it, too.