[kismac] Re: New SVN Server?!

  • From: Francis Gulotta <reconbot@xxxxxxx>
  • To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:13:55 -0500

It's 8am here, I say we give it a few days, we owe Mick that much. But.. Forking is highly encouraged, he'll probably keep doing what he does too and we can share. I say go for a community project (domian, trac/svn server), I'd just love to see Mick along for the ride.


On Jan 27, 2006, at 7:14 AM, globo wrote:

A M. Rossberg is listed in the phonebook.
Maybe we should give him a call?

On the other hand - I would assume that he's subscribed to the list and
should know what is going on?

What are your thoughts on privacy here?


Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:26:28 +1030
 schrieb themacuser <themacuser@xxxxxxxxx>:
Yeah, I have tried to contact him too on a few occasions, he said
 that he'd try to include my patches in the next version (r76 as r75
 was the one out at the time), it didn't happen.

On 27/01/2006, at 10:20 PM, numE wrote:

I tried to contact mick serveral times in the past..
concerning universal binary support, etc...
i never got any response...
perhaps you'll have more luck...

Geoffrey Kruse schrieb:
I hosted the cvs server for KisMac back in the day on my cable
connection...  I could possibly do the same for SVN but it would
nothing spectacular speed wise. Also just a thought, I'd wait to

from Mick and get his thoughts on forking etc.  It might just be
easier to wait until he responds and use the current server setup,
maybe adding trac.  Adding admins to a project is a lot less work


On Jan 27, 2006, at 7:42 AM, themacuser wrote:

The trouble is that trac requires a server. At the moment,
is a bit small to handle something like svn managment or
like trac. Can someone else offer a server? I've sent in an
application to SourceForge for the project, we might not end up
needing it, but we can use it just to provide downloads etc if

Subversion is only available to some projects in a beta test, but
IME, subversion has no real differences from CVS in actual
Some time around February is the planned release date for giving
to everyone. That's not too far away.

Anyone want to be a project admin and help set things up?

On 27/01/2006, at 10:02 PM, numE wrote:

We could swap to another hoster later... if there are problems.
another thing we should definitly look at is the so called "trac
it's much better than the default sourceforge thing.

here you can see it in action:
trac.adiumx.com (adiumx is an osx instant messager probably all

of you
know) ;-)

Francis Gulotta schrieb:
This is really cool, but I don't know if they offer svn to
project yet or if it's still in trial. Just look out for it.

On Jan 27, 2006, at 6:22 AM, themacuser wrote:

I'm signing up a project page on sourceforge now. Do you want

to be
an admin on the project too? Sign up at http://sf.net and tell
your username.
On 27/01/2006, at 9:48 PM, themacuser wrote:

Excellent! I like it. Now how did I not think of that?
On 27/01/2006, at 9:43 PM, numE wrote:

What about KisMac Reloaded? :-)

themacuser schrieb:
I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where

opensource projects go.
Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't?

If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the
name I

KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days

The SVN release seems to be named KisMacNG (NG standing for


How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third

On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote:

It seems like there are some people willing
to restart the development of kismac.

What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc?
this is a very nice system:

the adiumx guys use it, too.

Francis Gulotta reconbot@xxxxxxx I'm just this guy, you know?

Francis Gulotta reconbot@xxxxxxx I'm just this guy, you know?

Other related posts: