[kismac] Re: New SVN Server?!
- From: numE <numE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:45:13 +0100
i'd donate serverspace if needed...
we could even register a project domain if we wanted..
i'd donate this too....
the company i work at has quite good conditions, so a domain/year would
be cheaper
than a package of cigarettes.
themacuser schrieb:
> The trouble is that trac requires a server. At the moment, gm2.ath.cx
> is a bit small to handle something like svn managment or something
> like trac. Can someone else offer a server? I've sent in an
> application to SourceForge for the project, we might not end up
> needing it, but we can use it just to provide downloads etc if need be...
>
> Subversion is only available to some projects in a beta test, but IME,
> subversion has no real differences from CVS in actual practice. Some
> time around February is the planned release date for giving SVN to
> everyone. That's not too far away.
>
> Anyone want to be a project admin and help set things up?
>
> On 27/01/2006, at 10:02 PM, numE wrote:
>
>> We could swap to another hoster later... if there are problems.
>> another thing we should definitly look at is the so called "trac
>> system".
>> it's much better than the default sourceforge thing.
>>
>> here you can see it in action:
>> trac.adiumx.com (adiumx is an osx instant messager probably all of you
>> know) ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Francis Gulotta schrieb:
>>> This is really cool, but I don't know if they offer svn to every
>>> project yet or if it's still in trial. Just look out for it.
>>> -Francis
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2006, at 6:22 AM, themacuser wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm signing up a project page on sourceforge now. Do you want to be
>>>> an admin on the project too? Sign up at http://sf.net and tell me
>>>> your username.
>>>> On 27/01/2006, at 9:48 PM, themacuser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Excellent! I like it. Now how did I not think of that?
>>>>> On 27/01/2006, at 9:43 PM, numE wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What about KisMac Reloaded? :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> themacuser schrieb:
>>>>>>> I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where most
>>>>>>> opensource projects go.
>>>>>>> Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the project
>>>>>>> name I
>>>>>>> guess.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days before SVN...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The SVN release seems to be named KisMacNG (NG standing for next
>>>>>>> generation?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third generation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems like there are some people willing
>>>>>>>> to restart the development of kismac.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc?
>>>>>>>> this is a very nice system:
>>>>>>>> http://trac.edgewall.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the adiumx guys use it, too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Francis Gulotta
>>> reconbot@xxxxxxx
>>> I'm just this guy, you know?
>>
>>
Other related posts:
