[hipl-users] Re: Test fails due to use the HIT as a *real* address
- From: Miika Komu <miika@xxxxxx>
- To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:07:07 +0200 (EET)
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Jesús Rojo Martínez wrote:
Actually I didn't add anything... :S Can that have been added
automatically in someway?
Tomorrow I'll try it!
Actually, I confused some lines in the output. Anyway, the problem is with
routing, so let's have a look at it again.
node1:~# setkey -D
No SAD entries.
node1:~# route -6 -n
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next
Hop Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
::1/128
:: U 0 1 1 lo
2001:73:1a32:d033:b07c:4e08:3f60:6294/128
:: U 0 0 1 lo
2001:73:1a32:d033:b07c:4e08:3f60:6294/128
:: U 1024 0 0 dummy0
2001:75:7922:b367:f79e:c3c2:5cfe:1489/128
:: U 0 0 1 lo
2001:75:7922:b367:f79e:c3c2:5cfe:1489/128
:: U 1024 0 0 dummy0
2001:76:74e0:4890:9db4:fc87:caa2:bfbd/128
:: U 0 0 1 lo
2001:76:74e0:4890:9db4:fc87:caa2:bfbd/128
:: U 1024 0 0 dummy0
2001:7c:a6dc:f37c:96b6:3d3e:2c42:99d/128
:: U 0 0 1 lo
2001:7c:a6dc:f37c:96b6:3d3e:2c42:99d/128
:: U 1024 0 0 dummy0
2001:70::/28
:: U 256 0 0 dummy0
This looks similar as in my machine.
3ffe::1/128
:: U 0 16 1 lo
3ffe::/64
:: U 256 0 0 eth0
Same here.
fe80::989f:c4ff:fe68:d43a/128
:: U 0 0 1 lo
fe80::a8cc:ff:fe00:bd01/128
:: U 0 2 1 lo
fe80::/64
:: U 256 0 0 eth0
fe80::/64
:: U 256 0 0 dummy0
ff00::/8
:: U 256 0 0 eth0
ff00::/8
:: U 256 0 0 dummy0
Otherwise similar, but there is not default route:
::/0 fe80::2e0:b6ff:fe06:677a
UGDA 1024 114 0 eth1
ip -6 route add default dev eth0
You can also simulate routing to an ip address:
ip route get 3ffe::4
3ffe::4 via 3ffe::4 dev eth1 src 3ffe::1 metric 0
cache mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295
If you get a HIT there (while hipd is running), something is wrong with
the routing.
--
Miika Komu http://www.iki.fi/miika/
Other related posts:
