[hipl-dev] Re: [Merge] lp:~hipl-core/hipl/libhip into lp:hipl

  • From: Diego Biurrun <diego@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: hipl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:23:42 +0200

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:53:01PM +0300, Xin Gu wrote:
> On 12/05/12 14:00, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:13:17AM +0300, Xin Gu wrote:
> >>On 11/05/12 00:55, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >>>>@@ -202,6 +166,47 @@
> >>>>
> >>>>+lib_hipl_libhipl_la_SOURCES = lib/hipl/accessor.c                        
> >>>> \
> >>>>+                              lib/hipl/lhipl.c                           
> >>>> \
> >>>>+                              lib/hipl/lhipl_sock.c                      
> >>>> \
> >>>>+                              lib/hipl/lhipl_operations.c                
> >>>> \
> >>>Why this lhipl prefix?
> >>It is a short form for libhipl. This prefix can help to identify src
> >>code files related to libhipl.
> >There is no need to identify files in the libhipl directory as belonging
> >to libhipl.  What else would they belong to?  We don't have hipfw_ and
> >hipd_ prefixes in the hipd/ and hipfw/ directories.
> 
> I was not so clear in previous reply. This prefix aims to identify
> src code files related to library-based HIP.

Maybe it was not clear enough in my previous reply: We have a directory
to identify source code files related to librarized HIPL, there is no
need for a prefix.

Diego

Other related posts: