On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:03:24PM +0200, Xin Gu wrote: > On 13/02/12 13:33, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >And that was a *huge* bug that you amplified a hundredfold in this > >merge request. Fixed. hipfw does not and must not depend on hipd > >code. Your build system changes must reflect this and you must not > >make hipfw depend on hipd with "autotools" handwaving. > > The diff result below shows one approach I find for this issue. > The idea is building midauth_builder.c into an intermediate lib and > later linking it to both libhipdaemon.la and hipfw. > Do you think it is ok? No, it does not. Now there is one extra, completeley senseless, library containing only one object file. Do you realize we already build a library with the common code (libhipcore)? That's where common code should go, not in second library for common code. Also, I already fixed the issue. Diego