[openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:42:09 +0200 CEST
> I think that would be interesting as well. Of course, I would also
> like
> to see Haiku and/or other operating systems support some of X's
> "exotic"
> capabilities as well. I love being able to ssh into a Linux box with
> X
> forwarding enabled, and being able to start apps there and have them
> accessible locally along with my other applications.
That can be done with Haiku as well. We should have a relatively
working VNC server :)
Btw, BeOS sources had support for a networked version of the app_server
link protocol, but it wasn't enabled. I'm not sure it ever worked
though.
I believe many apps would have problems with that, as many just use
BBitmap::Bits() without locking it, making it unaware of when changes
happen (and so when it needs to be uploaded back).
(but that can be fixed when we have sources.
> >> Of course, now with the Intel Nano processors in the market,
> > > mobile
> >> computing doesn't necessarily mean mostly ARM any more.
> >>
> >
> > I wonder how long it will be before Win Mobile is focused on
> > Nano...
> >
> >
> We can only hope that MS makes a focus shift to it, and drives
> themselves out of business... ;-)
If only!
François.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- From: Raymond C. Rodgers
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- From: Raymond C. Rodgers
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- From: Raymond C. Rodgers
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V8 #104
- From: Raymond C. Rodgers