[openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- From: Jeffrey Parke <jeffrey.parke@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:00:56 -0500
Sikosis wrote:
Honestly I couldn't care less about ruby ...
Cheers
Sikosis
On 30/07/2008, at 3:05 AM, "datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I saw this the other day and though I would post a bit of it here.
I am assuming that in this case beos/haiku is the same.
I don't really have a lot of knowledge in this area but am suspecting
that becoming supported again later would be a lot more
difficult then finding a maintainer before it was dropped.
Really loved BEOS, and recently have been learning Ruby so would love
to be able to use both in the future.
Summary:
Ruby 1.9.0-3 is released
From: "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui yugui.jp <http://yugui.jp>>
== Platforms
Ruby 1.9 no longer supports the following platforms because they have no
active maintainer.
* BeOS
* WinCE
* OS/2
* Interix
* bcc32
* Classic MacOS
* djgpp
* VMS
* human68k
I will remove platform-specific codes for them from Ruby, unless someone
become a maintainer by 25 Sep.
Regards,
- --
Yugui <yugui / yugui.jp <http://yugui.jp>>
http://yugui.jp
Full original post:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/309172
datatec
well i kind of like the language. I can't use it yet, but yet as I think
about it, I'd rather learn python instead.
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
- » [openbeos] Re: Ruby 1.9 will no longer supports Beos unless a maintainer steps forward before Sept 25th.
Honestly I couldn't care less about ruby ... Cheers SikosisOn 30/07/2008, at 3:05 AM, "datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:datatec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I saw this the other day and though I would post a bit of it here. I am assuming that in this case beos/haiku is the same.I don't really have a lot of knowledge in this area but am suspecting that becoming supported again later would be a lot moredifficult then finding a maintainer before it was dropped.Really loved BEOS, and recently have been learning Ruby so would love to be able to use both in the future.Summary: Ruby 1.9.0-3 is released From: "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui yugui.jp <http://yugui.jp>> == Platforms Ruby 1.9 no longer supports the following platforms because they have no active maintainer. * BeOS * WinCE * OS/2 * Interix * bcc32 * Classic MacOS * djgpp * VMS * human68k I will remove platform-specific codes for them from Ruby, unless someone become a maintainer by 25 Sep. Regards, - -- Yugui <yugui / yugui.jp <http://yugui.jp>> http://yugui.jp Full original post: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/309172 datatec