[openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: "Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:35:50 -0500
>> The OpenBeOS focus has been on drivers. Mostly the
>> ones that everyone forgets about - serial, parallel, mouse,
>> kbd, IDE, CD-ROM, etc. A project plan is forthcoming -
>> I just need to fill it in with names.
>
>What do the interrupt vector tables look like for for
>the various hardware? Is there documentation for these?
You shouldn't need to know that. Posix should use the native
open/close/read/write/ioctl provided by the kernel.
>Out of curiosity, one of my (opinions) thoughts, was that
>*NO* drivers should be seriously embedded into the kernel.
Agreed. But they are part of the kernel distro.
Also note that they are embedded for right now. That will change.
>Are the IDE, CD-ROM....etc drivers generic modules that can
>be dropped from the kernel, by the user, once a better driver comes along,
>or will that require a complete recompile of the OS?
Yes, they will be generic modules.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: P Willis
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: P Willis