What??? That header should be replaced with a correct one and put into our sources. And put into the next installation preferably. This is much better than having people edit header files themselves (and potentially screw them up). >> Maybe the header could be distributed with the OpenBFS source. > >I don't think it is a good idea at all. The header stays out. See the >instructions in the OpenBeOS page on how to add the missing entry to >the header in question. > >-Bruno > > >-- >Fortune Cookie Says: > >Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it. > -- Russell Baker > >