[openbeos] Re: Building OpenBFS...

  • From: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeiffer@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:05:47 +0200

5/2/02 1:48:03 PM, "Bruno G. Albuquerque" <bga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> >> That header should be replaced with a correct one and put into our 
>> >> sources. And put into the next installation preferably. This is 
>> > > much 
>> >> better than having people edit header files themselves (and 
>> >> potentially 
>> >> screw them up).
>> >
>> >Point is, it is a Be header.
>> 
>> And why should this be a problem?
>
>I have no idea. But I guess it could. Also, it is possible that this 
>header has the definition of load_driver_symbols() but does not have 
>the definition of something else. I never really checked it.

Sorry, I have not followed this thread from the beginning. I thought
you had concerns about legal issues.

- Michael



Other related posts: