[openbeos] Re: Building OpenBFS...

> >> That header should be replaced with a correct one and put into our 
> >> sources. And put into the next installation preferably. This is 
> > > much 
> >> better than having people edit header files themselves (and 
> >> potentially 
> >> screw them up).
> >
> >Point is, it is a Be header.
> And why should this be a problem?

I have no idea. But I guess it could. Also, it is possible that this 
header has the definition of load_driver_symbols() but does not have 
the definition of something else. I never really checked it.


Fortune Cookie Says:

The Kennedy Constant:
        Don't get mad -- get even.

Other related posts: