> >> That header should be replaced with a correct one and put into our > >> sources. And put into the next installation preferably. This is > > > much > >> better than having people edit header files themselves (and > >> potentially > >> screw them up). > > > >Point is, it is a Be header. > > And why should this be a problem? I have no idea. But I guess it could. Also, it is possible that this header has the definition of load_driver_symbols() but does not have the definition of something else. I never really checked it. -Bruno -- Fortune Cookie Says: The Kennedy Constant: Don't get mad -- get even.