En réponse à Michael Noisternig <michael.noisternig@xxxxxxxxx>: > Isaac Yonemoto wrote: > [snip] > > Are there real problems with this idea? Because, it seems to me, > that > > implementing something like this would allow us to do reboot-less > kernel > > upgrades, and neato instant-on features. > > In short, this idea is plain stupid. > > Longer answer: If you want to upgrade the kernel while keeping all your > > programs at the current state then you not only have to record all the > > kernel data (besides the user memory) but because a different kernel for > > sure has different data structures you have to find a way to convert > your old ones to the new ones which is basically impossible. > > > <rant> Maybe GNU Hurd will do this... </rant>