On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 04:32:25PM +0200, Stephan Assmus wrote: > Am 01.06.2011 22:18, schrieb pete.goodeve@xxxxxxxxxxxx: > >On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Stephan Aßmus wrote: > >> > >>And sorry if I misread the tone of your mail. ;-) > >> > >I think, you did, sorta...! (:-)) > > Perhaps we can agree on "sorta"... :-) While I misunderstood what you > meant by "waiting", you did say that OSS was useless, a waste of time > and changing the buffer size would probably be complex. Reading again > what I wrote to that, I think my response was pretty OK. :-) Definitely a case of crossed wires, I think (:-)). I was trying to respond to Scott's query about the state of opensound, but I guess I came off a bit more negative than I intended. Maybe a bit conditioned by the many months I spent trying to get (real-time) audio to work on my auich desktop box [#7285]. (:-/) Before your mail, I had no idea how OSS was organized, and was not really inspired to find out. With your pointers it may be easier. > > >However, I think I'm going to take this opportunity to make a point > >from the other end of the see-saw. I've submitted a number of patches > >and other fixes which for various reasons are vital to me, and most > >have been completely ignored. > > > >#4463 Add multi-ports support to USB MIDI driver > > A nudge once in a while seems to help, it's been committed now. Thank you! > > >#7182 Fixing Menu keyboard navigation > > Please CC me in the ticket for Interface Kit patches. Will do. > > >#7284 auich.settings not installed > > Just from looking at your description, it sounds like the wrong fix to > the problem. Why should a settings file be installed? That would > effectively change the default settings of the driver. If you mean to > fix the default settings, however, they should be fixed in the driver > instead. Settings files are for when you want to have something > different from the default settings. You're probably right. I assumed the file was in the source tree for a reason, but maybe the defaults were *supposed* to be the same, but got changed for the same reason that OSS has the giant buffer. Which brings up the secondary question of why a large buffer prevents sound working anyway. Thanks for checking the other patches, too. Cheers, -- Pete --