Axel Dörfler wrote: > #7258 is a candidate where you wrote half of a book in the comments, > where I'm not really inclined to go through again, and would await > Ingo's (who kept up with you all the time) next comment before I'd do > anything ;-) To be honest I lost the motivation. The whole discussion cost me lots of time and since the latest patch is still not "perfect", I decided that should I ever feel motivated enough again, I'd take a day or two to work on the issues myself (I don't see that happening anytime soon though). I only skimmed through the patch, but it definitely contains coding style violations and is not complete in that it fixes all associated issues (e.g. the wrong run mode of the consumer). I don't recall, whether I spotted issues with the patch itself. CU, Ingo