27 feb 2012 kl. 15:13 skrev Jürgen Wall: ... >> More thought should go into design, keeping it coherent while trying to >> figure out where we want to go with it, what we think is the future of the >> user interface. (And what devices to run Haiku on.) > I don't see any reason why this feature should negatively affect design > coherence or what we want Haiku be capable of. > >> I think Mac OS X has gained a lot from it's frequent release schedule. >> They get away with interface changes that would not go down well with >> e.g. corporate PC users. (Or UI-conservatives like us.) > .. and I have no idea what Mac OS has to do with it. I'm sorry for being obscure. :] Your proposed feature is fine, IMO, and what I wrote is only very tangentially related. I meant to compare the release schedules of Microsoft and Apple and user acceptance in the face of disruptive user interface design. Our release schedule is somewhat Microsoft-ish, as in few and far between, which doesn't help users accept change. I'm of the opinion that Haiku needs a redesign, even though I'm not clear on what should change. (Could be just me, and everyone else is happy.) A redesign would strain user (and dev) acceptance. One would need a roadmap, and avoid adding UI features that don't fit the end goal. That's the train of thought I had, anyway. /Jonas