On 11/22/2012 09:08 PM, Humdinger wrote:
2012/11/22, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:As a compromise, Control+left/right could additionally do sub-word navigation :-)I meant so that you could continue to use Ctrl for word navigation, while other people can use Alt -- and have both behave slightly differently so that you have added value.True. But it would still eliminate all CMD+cursor commands like in Mail or Vision.
Sure, but those happen to be open source applications that can be fixed. Out of curiosity: what is Mail doing for Command-left/right?
It could be acceptable, but unfortunately, the Command-left/right shortcut is often harmful, like in a web browser where your leave the current page, often losing the text you just typed. And that is just too annoying.Exactly. That's why CMD+cursor should remain issuing these back/forward commands and CTRL+cursor doing the cursor navigation.
Huh? I see no way how you could come to this conclusion. It's annoying, and that's why it should stay that way?
If the text control's shortcuts only work when it has focus, I don't see a big issue, though.While that may be true in case of the mentioned browser, there's still the risk of unintentionally losing focus. Apps like Mail will always have that issue.
What do you mean by that?
It already overrides Command-C/V/X for clipboard usage in that case, which is the exact same thing. IOW the command key never consistently issues commands to the app only.Well, one could see CMD+C/V/X still as being commands to the app that interact with the system's clipboard...
I really can't follow that line of thought :-)Imagine a window with two text views. Or even an additional document (like a spreadsheet). You will want to have copy/paste functionality in all controls.
Bye, Axel.