Axel Dörfler wrote: > On 02.08.2012 18:55, Ryan Leavengood wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Humdinger <humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> > >> Maybe an About dialog isn't that useless after all... > > > > Certainly at least to indicate what is a Haiku project provided > > application (I'm not using the word "included" since as you say things > > get muddled with package management.) Also it may make sense to have > > individual version numbers for applications since they may be updated > > independently in the future. I could certainly see WebPositive, maybe > > ShowImage, the Debugger and probably more being like this. > > I don't see why they would need to be released independently. If you > want bleeding edge, you'd probably just say to, and differentiate your > Haiku version by revision number (ie. that would be the unstable channel). > > If we backport things into an older release branch, we would still need > to do a point release of some sorts to get it out of the door (including > new test cycle, etc.). > > > Also we could consider adding a "Add Bug For This Application" button > > in the about boxes which opens the Haiku bug tracker with a new ticket > > with that application preset as the Component (assuming Trac supports > > that.) > > Sure, that would be a reason to have about dialogs. So there would be an about dialog with exactly one button for the bug report? Why not have a bug report menu item instead? > Just in case we > decide to get them back one day, we should still omit the authors from > the dialog then. In any case, I think package management is indeed a > good argument for getting them back. Um, didn't you explain above why package management doesn't change anything in this respect? CU, Ingo