On 2012-02-22 at 18:30:33 [+0100], Stephan Aßmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: [...] > Similarily, the problem with WebPositive is not that it has too few > features compared to a "full browser". I think the problem is that it is > not reliable. Reliability certainly is a problem and probably the most pressing one, but completeness is an issue too. Stuff like password, cookie, and SSL certificate management, a private mode, ad blocking, ... is missing. [...] > I think if the WebKit port would be more complete (most importantly > rendering and network backend), and if it would "just work" and be 100% > reliable, then almost nobody would complain it can't do this or that > feature that Firefox or Chrome can do. A good, native integration would > almost certainly feel more important to a lot of people. I like a good integration as much as the next user, but while integration issues are mostly just annoyances, missing features can be show stoppers. It is sometimes said that with 80% of the features one can make 99% of the users happy. But since even something as basic as printing is missing, I doubt that the level has been reached yet. CU, Ingo