On 2009-04-03 at 08:58:28 [+0200], Rob Judd <judd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Matt wrote: > > 2009/4/2 Stephan Aßmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>: > >> On 2009-04-02 at 15:27:15 [+0200], Matt <laceysnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >>> 2009/4/2 Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>>> "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Didn't we say we would change "beos" for "os" ? > >>>>> > >>>> While I would lean towards "system", I wouldn't be against this > >>>> either. Any other opinions on this one? > >>>> > >>> If it's going to change, why not just change it to haiku? > >>> > >> Because that would be weird if the distribution was not "Haiku". > >> > > But it would reassert what the distribution is based on ;) > > > That's a better argument for leaving it as 'beos'. ;) Nah, we still have the 'B' prepending all the class names in the API... ;-) Ciao, -Stephan