Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) wrote: > Short boot time is one of our selling points, and these results do not > reflect that quality of Haiku at all. I also thought that the lack of > feedback of what's going to the user (both during and after the booth > screen) makes the wait seem even longer. In other words, there is a lot > that needs to be improved if you want Haiku a live CD to make a positive > and enticing impression on the user. > > I know that you guys have been talking about how to improve the live CD. > My take is that it would not be wise to rush things and risk creating a > perception that Haiku is slow. So I think it would be wise not to release > any live cd (supported or unsupported) at the very least until you can > bring down the boot time to something shorter than the mainstream Linux > distros out there. Until then, try to keep the cat in the bag. :) I absolutely second this feeling. Are there any known TODOs with regards to our iso9660 filesystem implementation? Is it using the file cache? Can the read-ahead add-on be applied by default? Can it be made more agressive when it "detects" the read-only device (talking in user terms, but I hope you know what I mean)? Best regards, -Stephan