> 2008/3/6, Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>: > > > > Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) wrote: > > > Short boot time is one of our selling points, and these results > > > do not > > > reflect that quality of Haiku at all. I also thought that the > > > lack of > > > feedback of what's going to the user (both during and after the > > > booth > > > screen) makes the wait seem even longer. In other words, there > > > is a lot > > > that needs to be improved if you want Haiku a live CD to make a > > > positive > > > and enticing impression on the user. > > > > > > I know that you guys have been talking about how to improve the > > > live CD. > > > My take is that it would not be wise to rush things and risk > > > creating a > > > perception that Haiku is slow. So I think it would be wise not > > > to release > > > any live cd (supported or unsupported) at the very least until > > > you can > > > bring down the boot time to something shorter than the > > > mainstream Linux > > > distros out there. Until then, try to keep the cat in the bag. > > > :) > > > > > Don't we have some readahead code done as part of GSOC 2007 ? AFAIK > it > hasn't been yet integrated in the tree, right ? > Yes there is some, it helped a bit, but wasn't integrated. François.