[haiku-development] Re: Comments on these possible OptionalPackages

  • From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:54:27 +0200 CEST

Pier Luigi Fiorini <pierluigi.fiorini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Axel Dörfler ha scritto:
> > IMO integration in this case would mean that "libinfopopper" would
> > be
> > assimilated by libbe.so. It's classes and constants would need to
> > follow the general style, ie. B_INFORMATION_TYPE instead of
> > InfoPopper::Information. I would also find a more general name for
> > the
> > info/notification service, and I guess I would completely get rid
> > of
> > IPMessage, and would just use a BMessage with predefined fields.
> > The functionality of IPConnection could probably be moved into
> > BRoster.
> >
> > That's what I would understand under "integration", but that would
> > also
> > pretty much mean the end of InfoPopper as a separate project (in
> > this
> > case). If InfoPopper were a larger project, I would have the above
> > loosely drafted API as a wrapper around what InfoPopper delivers.
> InfoPopper is not a large project, it used to be part of IM Kit but
> was
> separated during the last year.
> It is used by some applications like Vision and by IM Kit with a
> specific client, so due to its architecture two clients can be made
> (one
> for Haiku and one for Zeta's own notification API) for example.
>
> If you and the other developers agree, I will start writing a patch
> to
> integrate InfoPopper as you indicated.
> In the meanwhile I sent a mail to slaad and indicated two possible
> ways
> to do the integration.
> One is to close InfoPopper without care about the projects that are
> using it, the other is to make InfoPopper a sort of compatibility
> layer:
> on Haiku it will build a new libinfopopper which will be a wrapper
> around the Haiku API, on other platforms it will build the current
> version.
> This way external applications like Vision can get notifications on
> R5,
> Zeta and Haiku, new applications that don't care about the past or
> applications in the Haiku tree can use the new API provided by Haiku
> itself.

That sounds fine!

> So, if it's not a problem for the core developers I will be happy to
> send a patch for Haiku integration.

I can only speak for me, but if you want to do the work, it would be
really appreciated!

Bye,
   Axel.


Other related posts: