Michael Burns <burns@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I also have alot of wood that I would like to treat and wonder about what non-toxic treatments are avaliable. Also, I am considering using "durablock" which is essentially like drywall but made out of concrete in smaller panels for the inside, south facing walls of my new house. I'm thinking these would absorb more heat from my southside windows and woodstove than drywall. Is this stuff difficult to work with? Is it hard to finish nicely? Too expensive? Am I crazy? My reply: What application are you treating the wood for? Is it just at risk of occasional dampness or is in ground contact? For ground contact, I wouldn't bank on any treatment lasting forever. Even CCA leaches with time unless the environment is pretty dry. ACQ will probably replace CCA in most of the current places CCA is currently used. Locust (only the heartwood is rot resistent) is good for 20 years or so. White oak and catalpa are in the same league. They would be ok for bottom plates (although I believe the code requires pressure treated) or porch floors and the like. Since the point of preservatives is to kill fungi, they cannot be "non-toxic". The best we can do is minimally toxic to humans. Copper napthenate (in Cuprinol, among other brands)is a paint-on product with relatively low human toxicity (attributable to the vehicle in which it is suspended, a volatile organic)and suffices to beef up the rot resistance of things like porch floor joists where the wetness is not continuous. Boric acid treatments also work, but only if the protection is for a rare event, since the borate leaches readily. I also know of no source for a paint-on borate-based preservative. Above ground protection for wood surfaces can be enhanced with water repellents, of which there are many excellent products. I can supply you with a simple formula for making your own from linseed oil and paraffin which is very pleasant to work with, but you do need a solvent (turpentine, mineral spirits, or naptha) to dissolve the paraffin in. From your description of "durablock", it sounds like you are describing Durock, a cememtitious backerboard generally used for tile. It may have a slight advantage over gypsum in mass, but the cost of gypsum and comparative ease of use are overwhelming. It would be far easier and cheaper to add extra layers of drywall if the objective is to add mass. Boring, but easier. For greater interest, consider doing a veneer of plaster, which could be tooled for a "touched by human hands" feel. Veneer plaster is generally applied over "blueboard", a gypsum walboard with surface properties specially designed to accept the veneer plaster. Regular gypsum can be used, but you will need to apply a bonding agent. Joel Gagnon _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx