GP Team, I think Mark Gray said that, in a live meeting session. -- Otto Horvath [MS MVP - Group Policy] On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Darren Mar-Elia <darren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Who is "they"? J > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *FlowMaN > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:38 AM > > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now > available > > > > Interesting. They said that, you have to choose between Policy Maker > Settings and GPP. Technically it's compatible, but you can't use them > together. > > > > Otto Horvath > > [MS MVP - Group Policy] > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Nelson, Jamie R < > Jamie.Nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Will the GP Preference extensions process old PolicyMaker based settings? > Haven't tested it yet, but thought I would check with the group to see if > anyone knows offhand. > > > > *Jamie Nelson* | Systems Engineer | Systems Support, Information > Technology | *I N T E G R I S* *Health* | Phone 405.552.0903 | Fax > 405.553.5687 | http://www.integrisok.com > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:02 AM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now > available > > > > Thanks for the update Scott. I heard some rumor about the 27th for this > stuff formally appearing on the various download sites, so maybe tomorrow. > > > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Scott Klassen > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:59 AM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now > available > > > > Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions are now live at the MS > Download Center. Still no sign of RSAT though. > > > > Scott Klassen > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia > *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2008 9:54 AM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: Port Traffic For GPO > > > > If this is not Vista clients, then the following should cover it: > > > > ICMP > > LDAP: TCP 389 > > SMB: TCP 445 > > RPC Port Mapper: TCP 135 and then >1024 after the RPC connection is set > up. > > Kerberos (Can't remember if this is UDP or TCP in all cases but Port 88) > > > > Darren > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Jonathan Finkbiner > *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2008 7:48 AM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Port Traffic For GPO > > > > Quick and easy question: What TCP port(s?) does GPO traffic traverse? I > have some software firewalls deployed in the field that I believe are > blocking ports needed for proper application of policies. > > > > *Jonathan Finkbiner <jfinkbiner@xxxxxxx>* > > *Information Services* > > *Support Analyst* > > *Lifestyle Family Fitness <http://www.lff.com/>* > > > > > ------------------------------ > > This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to > protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be > for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended > recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the > contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If > you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us > immediately by electronic mail (reply). > > > ------------------------------ > > This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to > protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be > for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended > recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the > contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If > you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us > immediately by electronic mail (reply). > > >