[gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available
- From: FlowMaN <flowman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:46:39 +0100
GP Team, I think Mark Gray said that, in a live meeting session.
--
Otto Horvath
[MS MVP - Group Policy]
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Darren Mar-Elia <darren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Who is "they"? J
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *FlowMaN
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:38 AM
>
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now
> available
>
>
>
> Interesting. They said that, you have to choose between Policy Maker
> Settings and GPP. Technically it's compatible, but you can't use them
> together.
>
>
>
> Otto Horvath
>
> [MS MVP - Group Policy]
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Nelson, Jamie R <
> Jamie.Nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Will the GP Preference extensions process old PolicyMaker based settings?
> Haven't tested it yet, but thought I would check with the group to see if
> anyone knows offhand.
>
>
>
> *Jamie Nelson* | Systems Engineer | Systems Support, Information
> Technology | *I N T E G R I S* *Health* | Phone 405.552.0903 | Fax
> 405.553.5687 | http://www.integrisok.com
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:02 AM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now
> available
>
>
>
> Thanks for the update Scott. I heard some rumor about the 27th for this
> stuff formally appearing on the various download sites, so maybe tomorrow.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Scott Klassen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:59 AM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now
> available
>
>
>
> Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions are now live at the MS
> Download Center. Still no sign of RSAT though.
>
>
>
> Scott Klassen
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia
> *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2008 9:54 AM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: Port Traffic For GPO
>
>
>
> If this is not Vista clients, then the following should cover it:
>
>
>
> ICMP
>
> LDAP: TCP 389
>
> SMB: TCP 445
>
> RPC Port Mapper: TCP 135 and then >1024 after the RPC connection is set
> up.
>
> Kerberos (Can't remember if this is UDP or TCP in all cases but Port 88)
>
>
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jonathan Finkbiner
> *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2008 7:48 AM
> *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gptalk] Port Traffic For GPO
>
>
>
> Quick and easy question: What TCP port(s?) does GPO traffic traverse? I
> have some software firewalls deployed in the field that I believe are
> blocking ports needed for proper application of policies.
>
>
>
> *Jonathan Finkbiner <jfinkbiner@xxxxxxx>*
>
> *Information Services*
>
> *Support Analyst*
>
> *Lifestyle Family Fitness <http://www.lff.com/>*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to
> protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be
> for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
> contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If
> you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us
> immediately by electronic mail (reply).
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to
> protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be
> for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
> contents of this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If
> you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us
> immediately by electronic mail (reply).
>
>
>
Other related posts:
