[gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now available

So can both the PolicyMaker and Group Policy Preference extensions
co-exist on the same system?

 

Jamie Nelson | Systems Engineer | Systems Support, Information
Technology | I N T E G R I S Health | Phone 405.552.0903 | Fax
405.553.5687 | http://www.integrisok.com <http://www.integrisok.com/> 

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of FlowMaN
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:47 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now
available

 

GP Team, I think Mark Gray said that, in a live meeting session.

 

-- 
Otto Horvath
[MS MVP - Group Policy] 

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Darren Mar-Elia <darren@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Who is "they"? J

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of FlowMaN
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:38 AM 


To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now
available

 

Interesting. They said that, you have to choose between Policy Maker
Settings and GPP. Technically it's compatible, but you can't use them
together.

 

Otto Horvath

[MS MVP - Group Policy]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Nelson, Jamie R
<Jamie.Nelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Will the GP Preference extensions process old PolicyMaker based
settings? Haven't tested it yet, but thought I would check with the
group to see if anyone knows offhand.

 

Jamie Nelson | Systems Engineer | Systems Support, Information
Technology | I N T E G R I S Health | Phone 405.552.0903 | Fax
405.553.5687 | http://www.integrisok.com <http://www.integrisok.com/> 

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:02 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now
available

 

Thanks for the update Scott. I heard some rumor about the 27th for this
stuff formally appearing on the various download sites, so maybe
tomorrow.

 

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Scott Klassen
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:59 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions now
available

 

Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions are now live at the MS
Download Center.  Still no sign of RSAT though.

 

Scott Klassen

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 9:54 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: Port Traffic For GPO

 

If this is not Vista clients, then the following should cover it:

 

ICMP

LDAP: TCP 389

SMB: TCP 445

RPC Port Mapper: TCP 135 and then >1024 after the RPC connection is set
up.

Kerberos (Can't remember if this is UDP or TCP in all cases but Port 88)

 

Darren

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Finkbiner
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:48 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Port Traffic For GPO

 

Quick and easy question: What TCP port(s?) does GPO traffic traverse? I
have some software firewalls deployed in the field that I believe are
blocking ports needed for proper application of policies.

 

Jonathan Finkbiner <mailto:jfinkbiner@xxxxxxx> 

Information Services

Support Analyst

Lifestyle Family Fitness <http://www.lff.com/> 

 

 

________________________________

This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject
to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended
to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be
punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).

 

________________________________

This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject
to protection under state and federal law. This information is intended
to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be
punishable by law. If you have received this electronic transmission in
error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply). 

 

**********************************************************************
This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to 
protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for 
the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, 
be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of 
this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by 
electronic mail (reply).


This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to 
protection under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for 
the use of the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, 
be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of 
this information is prohibited and may be punishable by law. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by 
electronic mail (reply).

Other related posts: