[gmpi] Re: Reqs 5, 6, 11 for debate

  • From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:05:58 +0000

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:58:44PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Plugins must be able to control other plugins.  The actual control
> mechanism may involve host arbitration, rather than direct plugin to
> plugin links.  This control includes things such as parameters and control
> signals as well as things like voice allocation.

I think it /must/ involve host arbitration - it might be part of an
automation recording. Also the semantics of control ranges may require it,
if eg. output ranges are advistory and input ranges are mandatory.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. gmpi
  3. Archive
  4. 11-2003