[gmpi] Re: My plugin system
- From: Juhana Sadeharju <kouhia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:17:05 +0300
>and other similar programs and make them run as a plugin. there is no
>reason to put the complexity of such programs into each and every GMPI
>host.
Then we also need a separate flow graph standard, so that my reverb
written as a set of both the GMPI plugins and the flow graph
descriptions would work in all such flow engine plugins.
The machine hierarchy becomes complex:
master engine --> GMPI plugin with flow engine --> GMPI plugins
What if my reverb wants to use third party late reverberation unit?
I should write a simple GMPI host inside my reverb which then either
runs a monolithic late reverberator or runs a GMPI plugin with a flow
engine which finally runs a graph of a late reverberator.
It all would be simpler if the flow graph description would be part
of the GMPI. The problem that then each host should have a flow engine
is not any bigger than that then each user should have a GMPI flow
engine plugin if they want to run my GMPI reverb.
Besides, the flow engine need not be a part of the host, it can be
a GMPI plugin as you said. But, if the flow graph description is
a part of GMPI, the GMPI host could run only one GMPI plugin with
a flow engine, not several if users runs multiple copies of my reverb.
Juhana
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
