[gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: "Michael Gogins" <gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:54:37 -0400
Some plugins are necessarily copy to. Has anybody actually measured the
impact of always copying the buffers on performance?
===========================================
Michael Gogins
gogins at pipeline period com
Irreducible Productions
Silence, a language for programming music and sound
Available at http://www.csounds.com
===========================================
----- Original Message -----
From: <RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:55 AM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
> But some plugins are necessarily copy to, for example, a time-stretcher or
a
> mono to stereo converter?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Berry [mailto:mberry@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
>
>
> I agree with Steve here. I don't think that the plugin should be
> deciding whether or not its current instance is in-place or copy-to.
> This is a decision that only the host can make, because it knows the
> context of the graph.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Jeff McClintock
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: RonKuper
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: RonKuper