[gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: "Jeff McClintock" <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:55:03 +1200
> Q: Do we do in-place processing?
My Vote...
> a) Yes. A plugin-global flag indicates a plugins ability to do this.
or d) is ok too.
c) and e)? *biting tongue,..... biting tongue*
Best Regards,
Jef
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "GMPI Mailing list" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: [gmpi] Decision time: 7.2
> Moving on! :)
>
> Topic 7.2: In-place processing
> -------------------------------
>
> Q: Do we do in-place processing?
>
> a) Yes. A plugin-global flag indicates a plugins ability to do this.
> This tells the host that ANY input buffer may be re-used on ANY
output
> (perhaps withing some higher-level grouping of stuff (think MIDI
> channel?)). If a plug can not accept this rule, it must not use
> in-place processing. (VST model?)
>
> b) Yes. A plugin statically maps inputs to outputs. The host may
> re-use an input buffer for an output if they map together.
>
> c) Yes. A plugin is given inputs and produces it's own output buffers
> based on internal knowledge or other variables. The host is not
> involved, except to furnish new buffers as requested. The plugin
must
> re-use or release all input buffers. Variations on this can be
devised
> to allowed shared input/outputs. (baton passing, or similar to DX
model)
>
> d) No. All output buffers are unique from input buffers.
>
> e) Other. Explain.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Decision time: 7.2
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Decision time: 7.2
- From: Tim Hockin