[gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2

----- Original Message -----
From: <RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2


> This could work for me.  Who decides whether output pointers are different
> than input pointers?  The plugin, by declaring this requirement; or the
> host, just "because"?

the host decide what he wants , without saying it to the plug-in. The
plug-in maker has just to know that in/out pointer can be different or can
be egual (inplace).

Vincent Burel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Burel [mailto:vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:36 PM
> To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:41 PM
> Subject: [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
>
>
> > I know I've been a pain int the ass about a lot of these, but it's
> > just because I want to see this work.  As it is, it seems to be going
> > the other way.  No one wants to argue for the best ideas.
> >
> > I'm, of course, willing to go by popular majority, but I'd rather see
> > some form of consensus, even begrudged.
>
> here is my wanting :
> Plug-in recieves.
>
> "n" buffer pointers for input.
> "m" buffer pointers for output.
> "n" can be different from "m".
> "n" can be zero.
> "m" can be zero.
> inputbufferpointers are all different.
> inputbufferpointers are never null
> Outputbufferpointers are all different.
> Outputbufferpointers are never null
> inputbufferpointer[i] can be egal to Outputbufferpointer[i]
>
> Regards
> Vincent Burel
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following
> rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own words.
> Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not redistribute anyone
> else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
> words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: