[gmpi] Decision time: 7.2
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (GMPI Mailing list)
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Moving on! :)
Topic 7.2: In-place processing
-------------------------------
Q: Do we do in-place processing?
a) Yes. A plugin-global flag indicates a plugins ability to do this.
This tells the host that ANY input buffer may be re-used on ANY output
(perhaps withing some higher-level grouping of stuff (think MIDI
channel?)). If a plug can not accept this rule, it must not use
in-place processing. (VST model?)
b) Yes. A plugin statically maps inputs to outputs. The host may
re-use an input buffer for an output if they map together.
c) Yes. A plugin is given inputs and produces it's own output buffers
based on internal knowledge or other variables. The host is not
involved, except to furnish new buffers as requested. The plugin must
re-use or release all input buffers. Variations on this can be devised
to allowed shared input/outputs. (baton passing, or similar to DX model)
d) No. All output buffers are unique from input buffers.
e) Other. Explain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Michael Gogins
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Mike Berry
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Michael Gogins
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Mike Berry
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: Tim Hockin