[geocentrism] Re: translational orbit
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:16:59 +1000
No go Allen.. You are not including scale.. HC propose two myths.
One that the earth moves around the sun...
Now if this were the only myth, then your camera would indeed show the
rotation. and you are correct.
However the other myth makes your camera worthless..
Oh the other myth.. That is the alleged distance of your star... You see with
optics, everything past a certain focal length is infinity.. It cannot be
resolved.. And they have conveniently placed all the stars at a distance well
beyond your power of resolution..
Hope you got all that.. I didn't .. but it sounds good..
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 1:59 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] translational orbit
EUREKA!!......A translational orbit still produces a rotational
effect!...The punch line is ....
1. the axis of the rotation shifts from the body that is being
orbited to the center of the body in the translational orbit....
2. It reverses the effects of the rotational effects. That is
to say that a clockwise orbit will produce counter clockwise rotational
impression on film where if the translational orbit is clockwise then the
rotational effects on film will be clockwise!..
The fact that the earth's has a translational orbit around the
sun cannot and will not hide a rotation around the NCP which is offset from the
nightly NEP by 23 degrees.. YES, Im already fully aware of ALL the previous as
well as possible objections.....i was able to isolate each and every single
one.........I have now found the way to prove it as well as demonstrate how it
can be accomplished in the real world ......The solution is remarkably
"simple" but extremely hard to visualize due to the complexities of the
kinematics........If you imagine a set of crosshairs they have a up/ down equal
distant mark as well as a left and right equal distant mark....The trick is
understanding that the back and fourth motion of the sun by 23 degrees annually
is nothing more then up/down deviations from that up/down center mark.....The
key is as long as the right/ left center mark does not deviate we can still get
our rotation around a axis that lay parallel to a axis that is perpendicular
and runs through the suns (ecliptic deviation/ path) since it lay perpendicular
to the up/down centerline on our cross hairs, because it lays 23 degrees offset
..this is true because any rotation around the sun or ecliptic is not
dependent on the north south deviation of the sun/ecliptic ..the rotation &
it’s effects are around a axis that lay perpendicular to that deviation. Yes
we have to have a camera that does not move with respect to that ecliptic
deviation….I will show but we should already know exactly how to accomplish
that… .......the proof is quite detailed i will lay out the fundamentals bit by
bit so we don’t get confused by all the motions........I plan to submit some
diagrams and photos eventually...using real stars and demonstrating exactly how
it was done...but the key is a translational motion will still produce a
rotation on the NCP .....The rub is, I kept trying to tell you guys that the
clue was “hidden” in that “most powerful definition of rotation known to man”
....In fact, It would have to produce a rotational effect in order for all of
the motions to be "equivalent"!.............. Oh, what fun I am going to have
now.....”Destruction” and “chaos” the likes of which have not been seen since
the Renaissance itself..& ..It won’t take me any 400 years either!
Other related posts: