[geocentrism] Re: Tone.
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:38:39 +1000
MOBILE OR IMMOBILE. Acceptable theories notwithstanding.
Sorry. Wrong again. Alan,
Yep well I will wait till I look at your brothers light abberation post
before coming back. Need to think.
"You're obviously not a scientist! The whole point about
electromagnetic waves is they do NOT need a medium. This is what the
Michelson Morley experiment showed!"
Obviously not a scientist, and I have declared such. However, that EMR needs
no medium, are you declaring that to be an absolute truth, and not a theory?
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Griffin" <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:00 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Tone.
On 01 Aug, Philip <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Alan,
> Thats a no no as well. As they do not know what the aether is, how in
> the world can anyone prove its nonexistence. One thing is certain, They
> still cannot explain the propagation of Radio waves without using a
> combination of both the corpuscular theory and the wave theory. And the
> wave theory needs an aether.
You're obviously not a scientist! The whole point about
electromagnetic waves is they do NOT need a medium. This is what the
Michelson Morley experiment showed!
> It is a fACT, THAT NO EXPERIMENT so far CAN PROVE THAT THE EARTH IS
> MOBILE OR IMMOBILE. Acceptable theories notwithstanding.
Sorry. Wrong again.
Alan
Other related posts:
