[geocentrism] Steven Allens problem
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:12:13 +1000
Phillip, currently, no-one on Earth can give you an accurate model predicting
the orbit of the moon without the use of "look-up" tables which are all
geocentric based. No need to attack Allan in this way.
He's a bright cookie! Like a light bulb with the power off. Very hard to read
by.
Steven.
I did not ask that question, of predicting any orbits of the moon, and I did
not attack Allen..
I asked him to answer my question.. he cant, or won't, and from your letter
here niether can you even read the question.
I said no math needed, and certainly that should imply no need for tables.. I
post the questions on the moon again. its a simple geometric observable model
and I will add here not needing to have any heliocentric or galactic
complications...
Here the 2 queries again.. simple IQ tests. I have substituted rotating where
it means spin , with spin for greater clarity, though the context was quite
clear for rotating..
Exercise : Can an object orbit and not rotate? Where is the point of zero
rotation between a clockwise orbiting body which is spinning clockwise, and
the same clockwise orbiting body spinning anticlockwise, and all the points in
between. .. ??? I cannot understand why this seems so difficult, if you need
a pencil use it. Regner has given the answer a way with one word.
How many rotations does the moon have ? multiple choice. Simple system, no
galactic or solar system complications. Same answer for geo or helio ...
a. none.
b. one.
c. two
d. three
e. other.
.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:22 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
philip madsen wrote:
Phillip, currently, no-one on Earth can give you an accurate model predicting
the orbit of the moon without the use of "look-up" tables which are all
geocentric based. No need to attack Allan in this way. He's a bright cookie!
Steven.
Dear Paul,
Why did you find it necessary to patronise Regner in that way? Regarding
the 'real thing' what in heavens name is Regner doing that no-one else is?
Jack
Well from my view, Regner is a professional Astronomer, I'm not even an
amateur..But I got Wiki and a million web sites to help me follow his words. .
And Allen cannot even tell us how many rotations the moon has.
I dare not ask him the next question concerning the axes of the moons
rotations.
Philip.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.29/1124 - Release Date: 11/11/2007
10:12 AM
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Steven Allens problem
