[geocentrism] Re: Pre-Flood rain

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:01:40 -0800

Allen,

There is no indication that the water cycle was not designed to operate as it now operates right from the beginning, just as the seasons would have operated right from the beginning, and will go on unto the end.

1,650 years has plenty to do with the question, since mankind would have had an influence on the environment and atmosphere during all of this time.

Since you accept that scripture does not preclude rain before the Flood, I think it more realistic to assume this to be the case. This makes Philip's point about the rainbow then becoming a special sign all the more pertinent.

Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com


-----Original Message-----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:53:40 -0700 (PDT)

Neville,

 

I donʼt know what the % of humidity would have been and there is no statement to that effect but the indication is that it was high...... what I am claiming that it is possible to have high humidity and no rain indefinitely, if there is insufficient particle seeding . This issue of seeding would hold true even today the only difference is the capacity of the mag field......As for pre flood world, i examine the conditions nessisary for rain based on what we know about clouds and rain even today. Within that body of knowledge there exist the possibility of a pre flood world (a different world, smaller world with a stronger magnetic field) that would preclude rain even with "to days physics" ..... The mechanisms I point out are considered observable even by MS ............Having said that, scripture nowhere states that it never rained before the flood, however it certainly could be considered to strongly imply that, particularly in the whole construct of the context in Gen 2- Gen 7:11which is outlining the condition of the world up to the flood ...in any case im just pointing out the feasability of that scenario...........I do not think it rained......... nor do i see room for rain in the context except that 1650 years passed by...but then the question becomes "what does the fact that 1650 years passed before it rained have to do with whether or not it rained if the conditions for rain did not exist for 1650 years....?

 
 
----- Original Message ----
From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2007 4:15:55 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Pre-Flood rain

Allen,

Are you claiming that there was ~1,650 years of 100% humidity, no atmospheric particles to seed the clouds, and no rain?

Neville

Get Free 5GB Email – Check out spam free email with many cool features!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!

Other related posts: