[geocentrism] Re: Pre-Flood rain
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:10:59 +1000
not oxygen rarefied on the contrary oxygen richer..just as today lower
altitudes have higher oxygen content then higher ones..on a smaller earth the
oxygen content would be richer and this is bought out in that info i gave you
as well..
You miss read me.. After rhe expansion, given the volume of air o2 is the same,
then the atmospheric oxygen would be rarer (at lower pressure). Reverse the
action and you will see what I mean. If todays pressure is normal, then back
then the atmosphere's depth/height, would be much much more, and the pressure
accordingly.
I'm not confident of your elevator ride in an ark with all those earth change
tidal wave creating quakes going on below.. Why do we have to use a japanese
word we cannot spell to talk about a tidal wave.. Salami!
growl..
Im only following the evidence scientific and scriptural based on LOE
Low Earth Orbit????
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Pre-Flood rain
----- Original Message ----
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2007 3:07:33 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Pre-Flood rain
Allen, this time I admit that what you offer is intrigueing. But still some
important unanswered questions. When you say the world doubles in size, do you
mean like a balloon, becoming more gaseous (vapor) below, or are you claiming
increased mass.. an important distinction, and if the latter, you are on
serious doubtful science.
no meaningfull increase in mass...what caused the expansion? ..( a natural
explination) i dont know excpet perhaps all that water and water vapor in the
rocks ..popcorned..?? but no increase in MASS!..more like a popcorn Adam's
akins it to a geode but i say that is too slow for the rate of expansion would
have to account for the waters receding even if it took years after the flood
to fully accomplish todays geology..anyway something akin to slow popcorn
effect ............once the pressure threshold had be reached the initial
rupture would/could have been only as slow or fast as needed to produce the
nessisary water ................the ride in the Ark would have not have been
any more noticeable then a ride on a elevator over the course of the expansion
even if (most perhaps but not all.. i doubt it) all the expansion took place
over that one year of the flood...
Next if it is the former, then gravity as a value would not be altered a
great deal.
Gravity as a vibration would be affected and streagnthed grate deal based on
size not just mass ...just like larger sand particles can attract more on the
sound board then smaller ones ..or the surface tension of large vessles in
water is stronger then the surface tension on smaller objects..... smaller
objects will colect together around a larger objects in water just as in space
the astronots on the way to the moon...uhmmm noticed that the smaller peices of
debree stayed with them all the way to the moon now regarudless of what the
cause is the effect is the same net effect........ this is one of the suporting
evidences i think for a Aetheral vibrational model of gravity although there
are other independent evidences as welll..........
I grant the atmospheric gases if not increased in quantity save more water
vapor, having a higher altitude configuration and thus a lower density, (it
has to spread over a much larger volume) would be further from the magnetic
entensity of the core, and thus more affected by cosmic rays as you say. It
seems that the importance of the solar winds effect on cosmic rays and cloud
formation is an important plank against man made climate change, and an
important part of the rain drought cycle. But this occurs even today, without
the need for any ballooning of the planet. i dont follow.....? on a smaller
earth with a denser mag field the cloud cover we see today would/ could not
exist based on the mechanics what we observed today.....no clouds no rain....no
rain no rainbow in the sky...regardless of the atmosphereic volume.......
Also such ballooning effects the humidity and air pressures, amount of
saturated water vapor, all of which would make for an enlarged volumetric
change in the water cycle without actually changing principles involved. Not to
forget about the problems of breathing for animals in a much more oxygen
rareafied atmosphere.
not oxygen rarefied on the contrary oxygen richer..just as today lower
altitudes have higher oxygen content then higher ones..on a smaller earth the
oxygen content would be richer and this is bought out in that info i gave you
as well..
Why do you want to complicate things which were once so simple? I thought
that was my job here.
Im only following the evidence scientific and scriptural based on LOE
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin G. Selbrede
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 7:24 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Pre-Flood rain
On Oct 2, 2007, at 4:13 PM, allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
You are away on one of your rants again.
If you say so....:)
You go, Allen!
Martin
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.39/1045 - Release Date: 2/10/2007
6:43 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.39/1045 - Release Date: 2/10/2007
6:43 PM
Other related posts:
