[geocentrism] Re: Nature of the universe? & geostationary satellites
- From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:33:13 +0100 (BST)
[A] I freely admit all these things could be lies.
[N] That's all I'm after at the moment.
[A] However, the burden of proof rests not on the various countries and space
agencies but on you/us.
[N] I accept that.
[A] Then and only then could we put forward a proof that the accepted amount of
refraction is incorrect You would have to prove that it is all a lie, not just
state that you don?t accept it, based on your/our own assumptions.
[N] You are correct. My statement was scientifically flawed. I should have
prefaced it with, "In my opinion."
Thank you for pointing this out.
Neville.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
